NEWS BRIEF
WordTask launches new course on writing business and technical requirements
It's neither technical writing nor business writing, exclusively. The documenting of business or technical requirements is a hybrid activity. Our newest course, Documenting Business and Technical Requirements focuses on the unique characteristics and challenges of these documents.
If you are a business analyst, an IT planner or systems architect, this course is for you. Based on the technical writing principles offered in our Writing Technical Information Effectively, the new course provides the tools and techniques for user needs analysis, for structuring requirements documents, and for writing clearly and efficiently.
The course traces the writing process as it applies to determining the requirement from the perspective of the user. The process then allows the requirements writer to translate those user needs to the system designer's context. With this process, the writer can reduce the margin of error that often distorts the requirements from their original user context.
To learn more about this specialized training product, contact us now!
* * *
New title for our Effective Writing for Technical Specialists
One of our flagship courses has seen a name change. We hope that the new title, Writing Technical Information Effectively, will broaden the appeal of our most popular course to include writers of anything technical.
With the growth in the popularity of this course, many customers have asked whether it is suitable for writers such as health professionals and economists--whose subject matter is indeed technical--but who are not "technical" specialists in the sense that engineers and scientists are.
The answer is a resounding yes, and we feel the new title speaks to these writers of technical content. The course itself remains the same, subject to the same update track.
|
|
WORD PLAY
In our seventh installment, we list some very common Latin abbreviations, whose time for retirement from formal business writing has come!
We suggest erasing some of these from your prose because they tend to result in awkward parenthetical constructions that strangle otherwise healthy sentences. Others are simply archaic or lazy.
For the other installments of Word Play, please refer to previous issues of webNOTES.
- i.e. (id est)
- To avoid stricking words in parentheses, use its English equivalent, "that is." The use of the English phrase also avoids the confusion between this abbreviation and "e.g.," discussed below.
- e.g. (exempli gratia)
- The same advice applies here as in the above. Squeezing examples into parenthetical statements with this abbreviation impedes the flow of the sentence. It can also deprive the example of the attention it would better receive when cited in a sentence of its own.
- etc. (and the rest)
This abbreviation is far too general to assist most readers. When making lists, avoid "etc." as the last item. Instead use a more specific item that at least summarizes the category of elements.
Example
The following devices can be used on this type of telephone line:
- digital telephone set
- personal computer
- digital fax machine
- other digital consumer devices
|